Growth rate cuve modelling
Introduction to our growth-rate model
The study of the growth of bacterial cultures does not constitute a specialized subject or branch of research: it is the basic method of microbiology.” Monitoring and controlling the specific growth rate should not constitute a specialized subject or branch of research: it should be the basic method of advanced microbial bioprocessing. - Jacques Monod
The first step to controlling a culture's growth is to measure it. To do this, we need to model the rate of growth. We've seen other attempts at modelling the growth rate, but they all assumed too much:
- Exponential growth model: perhaps truly early on, but certainly not the case near stationary.
- Logistic growth model: requires an assumption about the max optical density, and assumes symmetric growth around the inflection point.
- Gompertz models and other models: more parameters, less interpretable, and still make strong assumptions about the trajectory of growth.
Further more, none of these can model a culture in a turbidostat or chemostat mode, where the optical density is dropping quickly during a dilution, but the growth rate should remain constant.
Re-visiting a growth model
We are often introduced to a growth model by the simple exponential growth model:
Plainly put, the culture grows exponentially at rate . Like we mentioned above, this might be true for small time-scales, but certainly over the entire lag, log, and then stationary phases, this is not the case.
There's a hint of an interesting idea in the last paragraph though: "over small time scales". What if we cut up the growth curve into many small time intervals, and computed a growth rate for each interval? Then our growth rate can be changing: starts near 0 in the lag phase, can increase to a peak in the log phase, and then drop to 0 again in the stationary phase. We also don't need to assume any parametric form for the growth rate, we can just measure it directly from the data.
Our new formula might look like: